Three problems we solve. One architecture that solves them.
SkyeConnex is one platform that addresses three distinct problem statements regulated organisations now face. Each maps directly to capabilities already shipping.
Data sovereignty
Make jurisdiction a property of the data. Allow-list, block-list, strict-mode policy enforced at upload. Real-time sovereignty score on the SkyeMap.
Explore →Multi-cloud storage
Reed-Solomon RS(5,2) erasure coding across 14 providers. Provider-agnostic by design. Invert lock-in by construction.
Explore →Ransomware protection
Immutable, distributed, encrypted backup that no single attacker can encrypt, exfiltrate, or destroy. Versioned, provenance-tracked, sovereign by design.
Explore →Why one architecture solves three problems
These three solutions are not separate products. They are three faces of the same underlying architecture: client-side encryption, multi-cloud Reed-Solomon RAID, and jurisdictional policy enforcement. The same encrypt-encode-scatter pipeline that delivers data sovereignty also delivers multi-cloud durability and ransomware resilience — because each is a consequence of the same topology.
The shared architectural primitive
Every file is encrypted on the client with a per-file unique data-encryption key. The DEK is wrapped by a User Master Key the server never holds in unwrapped form. The encrypted file is framed into ~5 MB chunks. Each frame is RS(5,2)">Reed-Solomon RS(5,2) encoded into seven shards (five data + two parity). Shards distribute across seven providers in customer-chosen jurisdictions.
From this single primitive, the three solution properties follow:
- Data sovereignty — because shards span multiple jurisdictions, no single jurisdiction's legal process can compel a complete file.
- Multi-cloud storage — because shards span multiple providers, no single provider's outage, breach, or hostile action affects availability.
- Ransomware protection — because shards span multiple providers, attackers cannot encrypt or destroy the backup target without compromising at least five distinct providers simultaneously.
How most organisations adopt these solutions
The typical adoption pattern is: solve the most acute problem first (often ransomware resilience or specific regulatory residency), then realise the others come along for free. Customers rarely "implement multi-cloud storage" as a project — they implement ransomware protection or PIPEDA compliance, and the multi-cloud topology emerges from the architecture.
This makes the migration calculus straightforward: pick the use case with the strongest current driver, retarget that workload, and the other properties activate automatically. There is no separate "now also enable multi-cloud RAID" configuration step because the substrate is the same.
Not sure which solution fits?
Most regulated organisations need all three. Book a briefing — we'll map the architecture to your specific exposure.